|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSING OUR RELIGION Social change can shake the ground like thunder, but it
can also arrive as silently as a sunrise. In 2001 almost five million
Canadians told Statistics Canada that they have no religion. That’s a record
number—16 percent of the population, up from 12 percent in 1991 and just one
percent in 1971. Pollsters call us “Nones.” Our
numbers vary enormously across the country, lower in the east, much higher in
the west. In Greater Vancouver, we outnumber all the other religious
denominations. In the city itself, we’re almost half the population. This is
unprecedented. We’re a growing force but we don’t get much attention. We’re
not organized. We have no leaders. We don’t shout, march, protest, or commit
acts of violence. When religion saturates a major issue of the day like
Islamist terrorism or gay marriage, we scratch our heads and question not
just the arguments at play but the very premises of the debate. We have no Bible or Koran to guide us, so we don’t think
alike. Some Nones rarely think about religion at
all. Some are atheists; some are agnostics. Some are strongly spiritual and
believe that there is a form of life or life energy beyond the physical. I
was raised a Lutheran but believe that we come into the world, live our lives
as best we can, and then die and dissolve into dust. Carol is a sixty-two year old retired social worker. Like
many people who reject organized religion, she had plenty of first-hand
experience when she was young. “I went to the United Church when I was small,”
she says. “My mother was the one involved with the church; my father never
went. I attended and then I taught Sunday school. I had perfect attendance
until I went away to university to study social work when I was seventeen. “But after I went away, I stopped going to church. Part of
it was my father. He was a doctor, and always kind of cynical about religion.
He felt it was hypocritical to attend church on Sunday and then do ‘bad’ things
on Monday. Because of him we were allowed to questions things like religion.” Religion is powerful, Carol says, because people need to
belong, need to feel part of a group, need simple answers to unanswerable
questions. “But those of us who don’t believe in organized religion define
ourselves in other ways. To me, religion is like a cocktail party: lots of
talk, lots of words without any understandable meaning, repeated over and
over. It’s very superficial. There’s no real intimacy, only ‘faux’ intimacy.” At 28, Kim is two generations younger than Carol. She’s a
software developer with two university degrees and a strong family religious
background. Her grandparents were Christian missionaries in Africa. Her
parents live in Portugal, and travel to and from Mozambique where they work
for Christian aid agencies. Like Carol, Kim fell away from religion when she was a
teenager. “I went to Sunday school, religious camp, did the Bible club and
the kids club. But when I was fifteen I started to question religion. I met
some quality people who were living different lives than what my parents
preached. I didn’t see anything wrong with not being religious. My parents’ rules
didn’t make sense anymore.” “I’m an agnostic now,” she says. “I don’t believe in any
religion. I neither believe nor disbelieve. To me it’s not an interesting
question because I can’t verify the answer. I’m not interested in lying to
myself to feel better.” Some Nones had little or no
exposure to religion when they were young. Cindy, 40, is operations manager
for a software company. “I was never christened, never baptised,”
she says. “When I was eight, a woman down the street offered to take me to
church. My mother said it was OK. I
remember going every Sunday for about a year. Then one night I went to bed,
and I was distraught and sobbing. My sister ran downstairs and got my mother.
She asked me why I was crying, and I said, ‘Because I’m going to heaven and
you’re not!’ My parents stopped the churchgoing.” “I only think about religion is the context of my son
Henry, who’s ten. He’s being raised a Catholic at his father’s request. When
he was attending religious classes for first communion I went one night where
parents were supposed to talk about how to support their children in their
learning about God and the church. I hated it! I was stuck in a room with
people who made it feel like a club I didn’t belong to. “That’s what I hate most about religion, the exclusionary
nature of it, the idea that ‘if you’re not part of our club, you’re not good
enough to get into heaven.’ ” How do Nones live a moral life
without religion? Carol, the retired social worker, sees morality as a form
of problem solving. “In a way, that’s what morality is about,” she says. “Perhaps
we’re better at it. We know there are no quick fix answers. We don’t have the
arrogance that we’re right. We approach every moral question with a sense of
personal confidence. We look at it and weigh it and then proceed. These are
skills you develop when you cut yourself loose from religion. “Part of these skills come from my career as a social
worker. Abortion, for example. Some people believe it’s wrong and wrong for
everyone—they impose their beliefs on others. But when you’re working with a
woman who’s wrestling with that decision, you help her make that decision
freely by seeing the options, seeing what’s in the best interest of everyone
involved in that decision, and help her explore what will happen depending on
the decision she makes.” Other Nones use the golden rule,
or some variation of it, as a basic guide to telling right from wrong. “My parents taught me to treat people the
way I want them to treat me,” says Cindy. “I believe in the golden rule, that
we should be kind, be polite, try to get along.” Kim, the daughter of missionaries, admits that her moral
sense has been shaped by her religious upbringing. “Yes, there is a lot left
over from religion, including the ethical part. But I’d say karma guides my
decisions; I believe I get back from the world what I give out.” Time magazine raised a furor in 1966 when it published a
cover story titled “Is God Dead?” The story quoted respected theologians like
Dietrich Bonhoeffer (“we are proceeding toward a
time of no religion at all …”) and academics like Harvey Cox, author of The
Secular City, as it tried to come to terms with the apparent decline of
religion in mid-1960s America. The doubts about religion expressed by noisy 19th-century
critics like Nietzche (“God is dead! And we have
killed him!”) appeared to have finally seeped into mass culture. But the Secular City did not triumph. Forty years later,
organized religion is still with us, and more prominent than ever. Although
mainstream church attendance is still down, fundamentalist and evangelical
attendance is rising. And newer arrivals like Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism
now claim a place in an expanded Canadian religious mosaic. The None argument has always been with the need for holy
texts, rules, churches, exclusion and structure, not spirituality itself. “My
own mind is my own church,” Thomas Paine wrote more than 200 years ago. Paine
was a Deist who rejected the idea of revealed truth and the organized
religions of his time. Paine’s ideas about religion eventually damaged his writing career. The bleed of religion into politics is an old story. As Carol points out, the stakes are very high right now. “It’s a very dangerous time in the world,” she says. “I think Bush has started what amounts to a religious war. In the US you have to wear your religion on your sleeve. People are emphasizing differences in religion, rather than the humanness we all share. We should be looking at what makes us the same.”
|
|
|
|
|