|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE YEAR OF MAGICAL THINKING A review by
Stephen Gauer For close to forty years now, Joan Didion
has used her masterful skills as a non-fiction writer to conduct a subtle and
persistent interrogation of American culture and political life. Her writing
is at once intensely subjective and completely objective; free of any obvious
bias or political loyalty, she’s always searching for the truth, for
the reality behind the image, for the mechanism behind the curtain, for the
wizard at the controls. Her first two
collections of essays, Slouching Towards Bethlehem (1968), and The White
Album (1979) are classics of social observation and inquiry. The more recent
books, Political Fictions (2001) and Where I Was From (2003), stretch beyond
the personal to tackle broader themes ( Didion
has always been the cool outsider looking in, a stance supported by a
precise, analytical intelligence and a prose style as transparent and
accomplished as Orwell’s or Hemingway’s. In her new book, The
Year of Magical Thinking, Didion sheds the outsider role and steps in front
of the mirror to document the horrific year of grief and loss that followed
the death of her husband, writer John Gregory Dunne, by a “massive
coronary event” at the dinner table of their For
Didion, grief is a form of insanity, or derangement, what she calls
“magical thinking”. Although Dunne had suffered serious heart
problems since the 1980s, and had spent the last months of his life with a
pacemaker in his chest, she’d convinced herself everything was fine.
“He believed he was dying, he told me so, repeatedly,” she
writes. “I dismissed this.” She tried to
dismiss his death, too, refusing to give away his shoes because he might come
back. She felt fragile and unstable. She had trouble remembering things. She
cried at unexpected moments. “Grief comes in waves,” she writes,
“paroxysms, sudden apprehensions that weaken the knees and blind the
eyes and obliterate the dailiness of life.” After 40 years of a highly
entwined marriage to Dunne, she felt the terrible tug of memory every time
she looked at his photograph or drove down a familiar street. Didion captures
the banality of grief (“Life changes in the instant.”) and its
nightmarish intensity (“If the house was dark, I would lie there
immobilized, entertaining visions of household peril, the books that would
slide from the shelf and knock me down.”) Her pain is
doubled by the serious illness of her daughter, Quintana, who went into
hospital with complications from pneumonia and septic shock just five days
before her father’s death. Quintana’s long and difficult recovery
is the second, and weaker narrative strand of the book. Didion, a fierce
mother who believes that “information is control”, reads medical
manuals, interrogates doctors and brandishes her medical terminology with a
numbing single-mindedness. Quintana, unfortunately, comes across with little
force and no dimension. She died of acute pancreatitis on Didion
wrote the book in just three months, in the fall of 2004. It’s a sad
book, of course, but there’s nothing gloomy or sentimental about it.
Aware of the survivor’s tendency to self-pity, Didion refuses to feel
sorry for herself. She’s too busy trying to figure out grief, to
document it, to write a narrative that makes sense, to quote sources (Freud,
CS Lewis, The Merck Manual, Emily Post, among others), like a diligent
undergrad, that might lend meaning and context and corroboration to her own
experience. In
her previous books Didion often used carefully controlled self-revelation to
disarm readers; in this book she breaks through that artifice to reveal
herself in full and contradictory complexity: a 70-year-old woman filled with
dread and fear, yet also strong and confident, a manager, someone who, in the
words of her husband “always has to be right”, a believer in the
simple-minded optimism of old pop songs, a “cool customer” (in
the words of a social worker), a loving wife, a prize-winning and wealthy writer
who questions her ability to write. Three
weeks after the Everyone smiled. How very wrong she was.
|